Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64
craig001 at lerwick.hopto.org
Wed Nov 11 20:25:04 UTC 2015
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Linimon" <linimon at lonesome.com>
> To: "Craig Butler" <craig001 at lerwick.hopto.org>
> Cc: "John Baldwin" <jhb at freebsd.org>, "Anna Wilcox" <AWilcox at wilcox-tech.com>, "Marius Strobl"
> <marius at alchemy.franken.de>, "Sean Bruno" <sbruno at freebsd.org>, "Jordan Hubbard" <jkh at mail.turbofuzz.com>,
> sparc64 at freebsd.org, "Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 November, 2015 8:22:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:17:32PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote:
> > Just to raise something else as well, port maintainers seem
> > hesitant
> > to push sparc64 fixes in.
> They don't have an effective way to test them. All they can test for
> is the no-regression case on the hardware they have access to.
Can we as a Tier 2 community build them something ??
More information about the freebsd-sparc64