[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

Ruslan Ermilov ru at FreeBSD.org
Sat Feb 4 13:28:42 PST 2006

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
> > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
> > > coverage analysis.
> > Then it should be the default, standard flag.
> I wish.  Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
> systematically opposes this kind of change.
What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and
usually compile successfully?  :-)

I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing
from the kernel builds now.  Perhaps it's still needed for some
platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure...  Can be
easily checked with "make universe".

Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/attachments/20060204/81981ac5/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-sparc64 mailing list