[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
des at des.no
Sat Feb 4 12:03:22 PST 2006
"M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
> > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
> > coverage analysis.
> Then it should be the default, standard flag.
I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
systematically opposes this kind of change.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the freebsd-sparc64