[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
wb at freebie.xs4all.nl
Sat Feb 4 03:13:20 PST 2006
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:54:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote..
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox
> WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox
> WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags.
> WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as
> WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less.
> Well, why not take the portbuild approach then?
> Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and
> *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental
> source patches...
Probably needs more hardware to keep a reasonable tinderbox frequency.
Wilko Bulte wilko at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-sparc64