[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Dmitry Morozovsky
marck at rinet.ru
Sat Feb 4 02:54:26 PST 2006
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
[snip]
WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox
WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox
WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags.
WB>
WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as
WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less.
Well, why not take the portbuild approach then?
Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and
*also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental
source patches...
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-sparc64
mailing list