[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

Dmitry Morozovsky marck at rinet.ru
Sat Feb 4 02:54:26 PST 2006


On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:

[snip]

WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox
WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox
WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags.
WB> 
WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as
WB> what normal release builds use.  Nothing more, nothing less.

Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? 

Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and 
*also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental 
source patches...

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the freebsd-sparc64 mailing list