TCP/UDP cksum offload on hme(4)
Pyun YongHyeon
yongari at kt-is.co.kr
Thu Jun 17 06:50:29 GMT 2004
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:42:58PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Le 16/06/2004 ? 12:45, Pyun YongHyeon a ?crit:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > 2. The patch was tested on Ultra2(2x300MHz, FAS366). I'd like to
> > hear ok/nok results from PCI based sparc64 users.
> > The dmesg of the Ultra2 is available at:
> > http:///www.kr.freebsd.org/~yognari/dmesg.u2.txt
> >
> > 3. I couldn't feel performance boost from the cksum offloads but
> > enabling it reduced system loads considerably.
>
> After some very basic testing (mainly ftp transfers), your patch
> seems to work correctly on my netra t 1125 (2*300Mhz).
>
> My -current is from mid april.
>
Thanks for your report. Did you get some speed up by cksum offload?
Did you notice system loads changes under heavy traffic?
How about NFS over UDP transport layer?
I can't saturate the wire with/without my patch.(For TCP without
witness it was about 67Mbps. On OpenBSD I got about 93Mbps.)
I vaguely guess the reason was caused by hme's lack of
auto-negotiation.
> --
> Herve Boulouis
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
--
Pyun YongHyeon <http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari>
More information about the freebsd-sparc64
mailing list