linux vs. freebsd

[Steven Hartland]

Same here performance on dual cpu / quad ( dual HT )
have not been a problem. Even seen over 260 days uptime on
a machine we lost track of till we went though asset tracking :P
That's on 5.1 and 5.2.1.

Ease of maintenance clear concrete releases and no new
fangled ( restrictive ) install gui's are what keep us using
FreeBSD.

    Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Stephens" <hsoftdev17 at hotmail.com>
To: <freebsd-smp at freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: linux vs. freebsd


> I came from Mandrake Linux after a brief time on Red Hat and I have been 
> using FreeBSD for almost 2 years.  It's a very clean and stable system.  I 
> would never go back.
> 
> I run a dual CPU system on 4.9-STABLE with no problems too.  I've managed 
> uptimes of nearly 100 days on my SMP system so I would have to say it's very 
> stable.  (It runs several web domains, hosts the database for them, and 
> other things as well, so it's not like it just sits around doing nothing all 
> day. :)



================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.