SQLite vulnerability

[Robert Simmons]

I'm objecting to your tone, which is nearly always negative. The link I
sent states the problem with your tone in a much better and more eloquent
way than I can.

I challenge you to change your tone when you post to the list in the future.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:28 AM Roger Marquis <marquis at roble.com> wrote:

> Robert Simmons acerbically replied:
> > Since you may not read that essay on open source software, here is the
> > salient point for you:
> >   - For users: remember when filing an issue, opening a pull request or
> >   making a comment on a project to be grateful that people spend their
> free
> >   time to build software you get to use for free. Keep your frustrations
> and
>
> The problem with Robert Simmons' line of reasoning:
>
>   a) keeping vulxml up to date is a fixable problem, and
>
>   b) ignoring the critical role of FreeBSD's security teams will only
>      result in FreeBSD boxes being hacked and end-users migrating to
>      Linux.
>
> Considering the lack of technical or logical arguments being made
> against, for example, larger security teams or security team funding
> (after all, we're only talking about timely entries in the vulnerability
> database) it would not be unreasonable to conclude that opposition
> viewpoints are simply Linux advocates.
>
> Roger Marquis
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe at freebsd.org
> "
>