Technological advantages over Linux
vas at sibptus.ru
Sat Jul 25 06:55:44 UTC 2020
You have intrigued me.
Paul Mather wrote:
> I also agree that this is a big disadvantage. Whenever I make my
> donation to the FreeBSD Foundation, and they ask in the donation form
> for comments on what you want them to work/focus on in the future, I
> always put a plug in for a native bhyve driver for docker-machine.
What would be run by the docker-machine in bhyve?
> This would go some way to putting it on a par with Docker under macOS,
> which uses HyperKit to interface with the built-in hypervisor under
> macOS (which is based on bhyve). MacOS is considered a "first class
> citizen" under the Docker ecosystem, or at least has great support via
> Docker Desktop.
What does MacOS run in its hypervisor by the docker-machine? Some linux
flavor? It does not have a native docker server, does it?
> Last I looked, FreeBSD only supported VirtualBox with
> docker-machine. It would be great to have native bhyve support.
But I thought, perhaps with the Linux binary compatibility, we could
avoid running a Linux in bhyve?
Or can we convince Docker to start supporting jails (just a dream)?
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49 at fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-questions