(very OT) Ideal partition schemes (history of partitioning)
freebsd at edvax.de
Sun Aug 30 15:14:51 UTC 2020
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:33:21 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from Polytropon (excerpt):
> > Most multi-OS settings seem to work best with BIOS + MBR.
> > Boot selection can either happen using a PF key at system
> > startup, if it's more than one disk, or you have a separate
> > software solution, like GRUB or FreeBSD's boot manager, if
> > all systems are on one and the same disk.
> How is that? It seems to me that GPT would be practically the
> only way for multi-OS.
> Grub 2 can be used to select the partition to boot.
> Some or many OSes can not run on a logical partition, only
> a primary partition, using MBR scheme.
That is a restriction that, if I remember correctly, does
not apply to Linux.
> And what if hard disk > 2 TB, or would that be 16 TB in the
> case of 4096-byte sectors?
Yes, that is definitely a special case (which will become
the common case in the future).
> > Within a slide*, you can create multiple partitions. The
> > common approach today is to have one big / and some swap.
> > The idea of "functional partitioning" typically suggests
> > a layout like this:
> slide? Did you mean slice?
Good catch - that was a typical "'d' next to 'c' typo". :-)
> I run several versions of FreeBSD and NetBSD, also need to save
> partitions for Linux and Haiku.
> FreeBSD and NetBSD can't read each other's disklabel or
> bsdlabel-type subpartitions, and sub-partitioning a NetBSD slice
> with disklabel is very tricky, drives me crazy.
> GPT means I never have to deal with traditional BSD disklabels
> any more; I don't run OpenBSD or DragonFlyBSD.
Regarding configuration and number of partitions, GPT is
surely much more convenient than MBR.
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions