Why very little documentation on "ifunc"?
mayuresh at kathe.in
Sat Mar 30 04:09:39 UTC 2019
On 2019-03-30 08:59 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:28:23 +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>> Ever since I stumbled upon "ifunc" I have been unable to find good
>> enough documentation regarding it under FreeBSD, that was till "Ed
>> Maste" pointed out;
>> "ifunc" seems to be a really good tool, wonder why it isn't as well
>> documented as rest of the stuff under FreeBSD.
> From what I see, ifunc is part of GCC, and FreeBSD does no longer
> use GCC as the system compiler (after switching to Clang/LLVM).
> The case for ifunc documentation therefore has to be discussed
> primarily in the context of GNU development tools.
> Of course, Clang/LLVM also has (limited) support for it:
> So this is nothing FreeBSD-specific which should be covered by
> OS documentation in the first place. But it could maybe find a
> place in the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook.
Not really, as "Ed Maste" had pointed out to me, "ifunc" was only
_designed_ by GNU, the "ifunc" implementation under FreeBSD is
completely native to FreeBSD.
I was first directed to "ifunc" by someone called "kostik" on the
freebsd-tech mailing list.
I could find nothing about it under the FreeBSD documentation or even
via Google, but that was because I was being FreeBSD specific. I asked
"Ed Maste" about it and he shared that URL I had put out in my first
It's sad that an advanced technology such as "ifunc" is not even
documented in the Developer's Handbook.
More information about the freebsd-questions