Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ...

[Mayuresh Kathe]

Couldn't you have simply done;
ls -lh *csh
instead?
Also you can see they are the same binary.

Doesn't matter that it is small, why have stray stuff lying around?


On 2019-03-29 07:33 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> KUDZU at HEARST:/BIN 130> ll -i | grep csh
> 
> 198147 -r-xr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  427888 Jun 22  2018 csh*
> 
> 198147 -r-xr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  427888 Jun 22  2018 tcsh*
> 
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:59 PM Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh at kathe.in>
> wrote:
> 
>> Since Tcsh is usually imported, why not send it to packages/ports
>> collection?
>> I agree that "csh" is an historically important artifact, but do we
>> need
>> to still rely on that?
>> I have been using "csh" ever since I started using FreeBSD, liked
>> it,
>> but it doesn't feel light like plain old "sh" nor is as feature-full
>> as
>> "bash". To top that, the installer asks me to choose between "csh"
>> and
>> "tcsh" in-spite of being the same binary.
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
> --
> 
> "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is
> no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five
> hundred."
> 
> - The Mahābhārata