IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now?

[J]

On 19-06-26 11:48:05, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2019-06-25 0:19, mailinglists-freebsd-questions at 927589452.de wrote:
> > But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons
> > to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT
>
> NAT64 is not the same thing as NAT44 or NAT66 (the kind of NAT to which
> "IPv6 doesn't require NAT" refers).
thanks for clarifying, didn't realize it