IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now?
list_freebsd at bluerosetech.com
Wed Jun 26 18:48:17 UTC 2019
On 2019-06-25 0:19, mailinglists-freebsd-questions at 927589452.de wrote:
> At the troopers con there was an v6 only network and most things already
> The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is
> required by most systems.
It's trivially easy to get routable prefixes up to a /48, and even
Comcast will allocate a /60 to IA-PDs. What system requires a prefix
shorter than /64 to number a subnet?
> But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons
> to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT
NAT64 is not the same thing as NAT44 or NAT66 (the kind of NAT to which
"IPv6 doesn't require NAT" refers).
More information about the freebsd-questions