spamassassin not lethal anymore
rwmaillists at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 12 23:06:00 UTC 2017
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:58:10 -0700
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> On 01/11/17 16:18, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> > On Wed, January 11, 2017 4:00 pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >> Milter greylist also helps considerably
> > I'm usually using sqlgrey for greylisting. In addition to that I'm
> > using amavisd (that harnesses spamassassin, clamav (and/or other
> > anti-viruses, - yes, I have windows people receiving their mail on
> > our UNIX servers), and variety of distributed spam signature
> > databases. Also, in postfix configuration (that we use as MTA) we
> > add some RBLs:
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> > reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
cbl is part of zen
> > I hope, this helps.
> I had hoped I wouldn't need to do a deep dive on state-of-the-art
> spam killing, but it's 2017 and the game has gotten tougher.
You haven't actually determined whether you have a specific problem
with SA, or whether your spam has just got harder. You might want to
upload a few low-scoring spams to pastebin and ask on the SA user
> Thanks for these suggestions. I'm implementing greylisting, pyzor,
razor2 has been a standard part of SA and on by default, since 2006.
> and the above client_recipient_restrictions. dcc I don't
> quite understand yet.
be aware that dcc is not a test for spam, it's a test for any kind
of bulk mail.
More information about the freebsd-questions