gnupg and gnupg2
jim at ohlste.in
Fri Apr 21 22:24:27 UTC 2017
On 4/21/17 2:30 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
> against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
> pkg info -r gnupg
> pkg info -r gnupg1
It looks like the option is to build mail/spamassassin with either or
neither (note that one or the other seems to be required for updates).
If you build your own, you can alter the configuration of
mail/spamassassin using 'make config'.
> On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny at outlook.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com>,
>>>> I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>>>> gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>>> port that relies on each.
>> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
>> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the
difference." - Mark Twain
More information about the freebsd-questions