gnupg and gnupg2

[Jim Ohlstein]

Hello,

On 4/21/17 2:30 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
> against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
>
> pkg info -r gnupg
> gnupg-2.1.20:
>         spamassassin-3.4.1_10
>
> pkg info -r gnupg1
> gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
>         clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1

It looks like the option is to build mail/spamassassin with either or 
neither (note that one or the other seems to be required for updates). 
If you build your own, you can alter the configuration of 
mail/spamassassin using 'make config'.


>
> On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny at outlook.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com>,
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>>>> gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>>>> gnupg2?
>>
>>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>>> port that relies on each.
>>
>> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>>
>> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>>
>> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
>> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
>>
>> --
>> Carmel


-- 
Jim Ohlstein


"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the 
difference." - Mark Twain