gnupg and gnupg2

David Mehler dave.mehler at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 18:30:08 UTC 2017


Hello,

Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?

pkg info -r gnupg
gnupg-2.1.20:
        spamassassin-3.4.1_10

pkg info -r gnupg1
gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
        clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1

Thanks.
Dave.


On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny at outlook.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>
>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com>,
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>> > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>> > gnupg2?
>
>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>> port that relies on each.
>
> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>
> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>
> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
>
> --
> Carmel
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list