Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here?

Ian Smith smithi at nimnet.asn.au
Mon Jun 6 07:29:52 UTC 2016


In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 626, Issue 8, Message: 21
On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:40:27 -0600 jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>

 > Why am I getting this after I reply to a post?
 > The list must have a subscriber who is on a spamming server.
 > If this continues, I believe I may have to unsubscribe to
 > protect my machine from possible malware.
 > 
 > 
 > Yo
 > 
 > 
 > -------- Forwarded Message --------
 > Subject: 	Undeliverable: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here?
 > Date: 	Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:36:55 -0500
 > From: 	Postmaster <postmaster at snaffler-net.bounceio.net>
 > To: 	jd1008 at gmail.com
[..]
 >         There was a problem delivering your email to:
 > 
 > 
 >         krad at snaffler.net

Please DO NOT FORWARD spam and related material to this (or any) list.

Then other people will lazily top-post and quote the whole bloody lot 
again, and again .. as just amply demonstrated.

If you have any sort of problem with spam, or this sort of issue - that 
comes up here repeatedly - the correct thing to do is to forward the 
mail in question - including absolutely ALL of the mail headers - to 
postmaster at freebsd.org

It is pointless, and annoying, to say "will someone pleae unsubscribe 
so-and-so from the list."  Postmaster is responsible for _scores_ of 
lists, and certainly hasn't time to read this one.  Direct mail to 
postmaster@, with sufficient detail to actually reveal the problem, 
usually has good results in my experience.

Deleting all the crap, at the bottom of your (digest) message was:

 > -------------- next part --------------
 > An embedded message was scrubbed...
 > From: jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>
 > Subject: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here?
 > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:26:28 -0600
 > Size: 7858
 > URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20160605/8f39576e/attachment-0001.eml>

If you download that attachment you than have all the headers needed by 
postmaster@ to see the problem delivery.  Hint: the message was actually 

Delivered-To: chrisscott1066 at tiscali.co.uk
Received: from cm12gb1 (10.101.251.12) by 
mail.svcgb1.int.opaltelecom.net
 (8.6.141.03) id 574E52E2004546F2 for chris_scott at ukgateway.net;
 Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:26:59 +0100
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([8.8.178.116]) by mx.talktalk.net with SMTP
 id 9clFbbvm5kpdi9clGbuKNn; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:26:59 +0100
X-Delivered-To: chris_scott at ukgateway.net
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D77E6CAA2;
 Sun,  5 Jun 2016 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org)

And as you'll see, went through a very circuitous path, via some very 
screwy looking servers .. note this one:

X-SMTP-MAILFROM: 
<srs0=hysflox2=r5=freebsd.org=owner-freebsd-questions at tiscali.co.uk>

Seems tiscali.co.uk is in the mix; owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org 
was the original sender, so that one at least is forged.

I'll do you the favour of copying this mail to postmaster at freebsd.org 
but in future please don't spam the list with this sort of stuff, ta!

Ian


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list