rsync or git backups?
steve at sohara.org
Wed Jun 1 10:39:06 UTC 2016
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:35:06 +0200
Luca Ferrari <fluca1978 at infinito.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
> so far I'm using rsync to keep in sync a couple of removable media
> (well, up to four) where one is the "master" and the others are a
> cascade backups (meaning they are set at different time).
> So far so good.
> One problem is that I tend to change things in the master, e.g., bulk
> file renaming or moving, so when I replicate it on the backups I have
> to force the deletion of no more existing content.
> This approach, however, relies on the fact that the master is good. My
> fear is that if the master corrupts some file, I could possibly loss
> them if they have also been moved since I will no more be able to
> recognize them on the slaves.
> So I would like to have some feature like git (or fossil) for hash
> handling, but since I'm talking about 290+ GB of binaries I'm not sure
> this approach could work.
> Any suggestion?
Use ZFS with snapshots (the zfs-periodic package is good for this)
and replace the rsync with send/receive, ZFS will protect you from hardware
silent corruption (provided you allow some redundancy - use copies on pools
with no redundancy) while the snapshots will protect you from mistakes.
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve at sohara.org>
More information about the freebsd-questions