Root on ZFS, LiveCD and BE
Victor Sudakov
vas at mpeks.tomsk.su
Mon Aug 22 15:05:03 UTC 2016
Brandon J. Wandersee wrote:
>
> > I'll check with the stable version of beadm in bhyve tomorrow, but
> > please note that BE selection made by beadm-devel itself (from a
> > working system) works perfectly. It's only the loader BE selection
> > menu that has this problem.
I have just verified, the boot menu problem is the same no matter if
beadm of beadm-devel were used for BE creation.
>
> I just set up boot environments for the first time with sysutils/beadm
> last week myself, so this seemed like as good a time as any to create
> one and try it out. I get the same behavior: activating a boot
> environment from a running system and rebooting works fine, but
> selecting a boot environment from the boot menu fails. So it's probably
> a problem with the loader. I'll comment on the bug report myself
> shortly.
Thank you for your comment on the bug report.
What makes me suspicious is the fact that the menu shows
zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 as the Active BE but the bootfs is still
zfs:zroot/ROOT/default:
s` `.....---.......--.``` -/
+============Welcome to FreeBSD===========+ +o .--` /y:` +.
| | yo`:. :o `+-
| 1. Active: zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 | y/ -/` -o/
| 2. bootfs: zfs:zroot/ROOT/default | .- ::/sy+:.
| 3. [P]age: 1 of 1 | / `-- /
| | `: :`
| Boot Environments: | `: :`
| 4. test1 | / /
| 5. default | .- -.
| | -- -.
| | `:` `:`
| | .-- `--.
| | .---.....----.
+=========================================+
Is it supposed to be so?
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:sudakov at sibptus.tomsk.ru
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list