Ominous smartd messages ....
freebsd at qeng-ho.org
Wed Aug 3 16:16:57 UTC 2016
On 03/08/2016 15:09, Jon Radel wrote:
> On 8/3/16 10:00 AM, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote:
>> Jon Radel writes:
>>> I've read reasonable sounding commentary from people running very, very
>>> large collections of hard drives that there is a high enough correlation
>>> between this error and the drive going to heck sooner rather than later
>>> that they take this as a sign to replace. [Can't find reference right now.]
>> While there's no way to know from the error message alone just what will
>> happen to the disk in the coming days, the general reasoning is this:
>> sectors are not physically segregated. They all sit on the same
>> platter. Several bad sectors occuring in a short period might be a sign
>> of physical fault in the platter, and if that fault is real then stress
>> from the platter spinning will likely cause that fault to spread. So
>> some people conclude that the appearance of several bad sectors in a
>> short period should just be a signal to replace the disk immediately.
> If I remember the discussion well enough (sad that I can't find it) my
> use of "correlation" was precise. They actually manage enough drives
> (thousands) and kept enough records to allow for statistical analysis
> which indicate that this smartd error correlates very well with failure
> within [I wish I could remember] timeframe.
> Do please excuse the utter lack of footnotes. :-(
I think everyone is probably thinking of Backblaze. This is their latest
summary of drive statistics
And this is their take on which SMART metrics matter
Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ
necessary to destroy the world drops by one point.
More information about the freebsd-questions