koobs at FreeBSD.org
Sun Jun 28 08:07:21 UTC 2015
On 27/06/2015 9:16 PM, David Naylor wrote:
> lang/pypy was originally set up to achieve:
> * building of multiple pypy instances based on different setting (i.e. with
> or without jit, sandboxing, etc). The port user could define any permutation
> she desires.
> * Install in a directory layout more similar to lang/python (i.e. libraries
> in lib/, include files in include/).
> I plan to simplify the port by removing the multi-instance support and using
> the default directory layout of the port. This will fix issues with
> virtualenv and reduce the learning curve of using/maintaining the port.
> To this end does anyone:
> a) use the multi-instance support?
> b) depend on the current directory layout?
> Based on feedback I will adapt my plans to simplify.
Thanks for opening up the question to the list David
My vote (without my python hat on) would be for lang/pypy being as close
to the upstream experience (freebsd improvements not withstanding) as
the possibly by default as that would be my expectation as a user
knowing nothing else.
>From there work on additions or extensions, possibly as extra (slave)
ports or something similar
More information about the freebsd-questions