No packages with 9.3-RELEASE? [was: Re: Port Changes FAQ]
Matthew Seaman
matthew at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jun 19 06:00:20 UTC 2014
On 19/06/2014 04:31, Ian Smith wrote:
> > pkg(8) is default in 10.0 and will be default in all releases to come on
> > all branches from now on. Given that the declared EoL of the old
> > pkg_tools is due in September there's only one more release (9.3) that
> > could possibly not have pkg(8) as default: however, my understanding is
> > that there are no plans to provide any old-style packages with that release.
>
> Please elaborate, Matthew? This is the first I've heard of this, I've
> seen nothing in -stable or elsewhere, and I'm more than a bit alarmed.
You managed to miss *all* the talk about pkg_tools being replaced by pkg(8)?
Note that I am not at all sure there will be no pkg_tools packages for
9.3. However I can be sure that there won't be any updates (including
security updates) to any old-style pkg_tools package sets after a couple
of months.
> If 9.3 is not to have pkg(8) packages - whyever not? - and no old-style
> packages, does this mean no package set at all for probably the last 2
> year extended release on the 9 branch? So will there be no DVD1 with a
> (relatively) consistent set of packages? Will there be no ports freeze?
Because the old package tools are obsolete and due to be discontinued in
a few months? There will definitely be pkg(8) packages for 9.3.
There hasn't been a ports freeze for the last couple of releases; just a
slush and a moratorium on sweeping changes.
There will be pkg(8) packages on the DVD installer images. If that
didn't work for you when installing 10.0 that's a bug. You know that
all supported branches have the default package repositories enabled now
(including 8.4-RELEASE and 9.2-RELEASE)? Do you also know how to turn
that off? Like this:
echo 'FreeBSD: { enabled: no}' > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf
That should solve the problem with your systems wanting to connect to
the net. However, that 'install packages from installation media'
thing really should just work.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1036 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20140619/69bcb089/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list