switching from ports to pkg -- mailman group mismatch

[David Benfell]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:20:43PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/4/2014 1:41 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >> Second, I now find myself in a situation where some software must be
> >> installed with pkg and some must be installed from ports. If it's just
> >> mailman, that's one thing. If it becomes a bunch of packages, I have a
> >> real mess on my hands.
> >
> > Yes, we have a mess.  If you need a port compiled with other than the
> > standard options, you can't use the package, and it's a challenge
> > to keep pkg from stomping your locally compiled versions.
> 
> What issue are you seeing?

I think he means the 'pkg' version where he wrote 'package' above. The
pkg versions are obviously built with one set of options, that
hopefully get along with each other. ;-)

-- 
David Benfell <benfell at parts-unknown.org>
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the
attachment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20141204/9b5fbd8b/attachment.sig>