mutt was a failure, alternatives?
guru at unixarea.de
Wed Apr 2 06:48:12 UTC 2014
El día Wednesday, April 02, 2014 a las 06:04:23AM +0000, Mayuresh Kathe escribió:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:18:49PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:12:55 +0000
> > Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh at kathe.in> wrote:
> > > hello,
> > > my attempt at compiling mutt with sasl support was
> > > a major failure.
> > > may i know the usual approach used for email under
> > > freebsd 10?
> > I use Claws-Mail under X.
> ah, okay, i was looking for a command line alternative. :)
> do people still go for the seperated mta + mua approach?
I do use mutt+sendmail in FreeBSD 10, mutt compiled from the ports.
What was/is your problem compiling mutt with SASL support?
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: guru at unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
More information about the freebsd-questions