New to FreeBSD - Some questions
freebsd at edvax.de
Thu Jun 21 19:26:30 UTC 2012
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:14:54 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > the experimental development branch -HEAD, it _might_ happen that
> > the system doesn't even compile, but updated 30 minutes after
> > that "accident", it runs fine again. :-)
> And finally unless doing tests or using private not-really-important
> computer, don't just install newest FreeBSD because it's out.
> I - and lot of others - still use 8.* for production while 9.* is out
> already for some time.
For home desktops, usually -STABLE is a good solution. Server
maintainers tend to use -RELEASE-pX (which also makes binary
> >> q) I would assume UFS with J+SU is "fast enough" for a laptop?
> > I think so. For a laptop, you _might_ consider adding encryption.
> > Just in case. You never know.
> for a server - you MUST do this :)
It's worth mentioning that it's not good practice to have a
keyfile-based decryption which is "unlocked" by a USB stick
permanently sticking in the server. Security is nearly zero
in such a constellation. Passphrase-based decryption is good
as long as you have physical access to the server and only
you (and maybe those you trust) have a secure (!!!) password
which needs to be entered manually at system startup to "unlock"
the /home drive or partition.
> >> q) The second laptop has an SSD, would UFS with/without J and
> >> with/without SU or ZFS make more sense for it?
> > There are several parameters that you can tweak (see "man tunefs"),
> > I would suggest a single partition spanning the whole SSD, and
> > journaling would not be contraproductive.
> s/would not/would/
> i assume this as mistake. do not journal on SSD. it increases amount of
> writes, and fsck is quick anyway.
Good you spotted it - of course there is no need for journaling in
this case (too much writes, no real benefit).
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions