Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware
m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Wed Jun 6 10:47:23 UTC 2012
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
> I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99
> goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as
> many binaries as you want.
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have to pay anything to a third party in order to
run whatever OS I want on a piece of hardware I own?
$99 as a one-off payment might seem a trivial cost to you, so much so
that you rather rashly promised to pay that for anyone. I won't hold you
to it. Even so, there are several thousand readers of this list. I
doubt even you could afford to subsidise very many of them...
Yes UEFI Secure Boot may have been around for 8 years. The fact that no
one has adopted use of it in all that time speaks volumes.
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20120606/9b26df52/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions