Why am I, Still subscribed and reading this list ?
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Sat Jun 2 18:25:53 UTC 2012
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Julian H. Stacey <jhs at berklix.com> wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > Because... at some point it may return to normal without all the
> > bikeshedding and, I run because, I don't run because.
> Agreed ! Many replies were sent to Wrong lists.
> Original poster & respondents abused stable@ & questions@
> Cross posting 2 lists un-necessarily, despite:
> "C.1.3 List Charters
> Rules of the road:
> No posting should be made to more than 2
> mailing lists, and only to 2 when a clear
> and obvious need ..."
> There was a desire, as always, but no need. (so I
> removed cc: stable@ on this post, to avoid this
> post also breaking that rule, (on the basis that
> stable@ readership are more likely to already know
> about Not cross posting, & using the Right list,
> as questions@ started as a target list to point
> clueless new users to, from /etc/motd. (It was
> expected as users grew experienced, they'd subscribe
> other lists themed to their interests.)))
> Noise was emitted to lists with wrong remits.
> advocacy at freebsd.org exists for promo. talk inc. re. wiki.
> Please read list remits, & conform to them, & subscribe appropriate lists.
> "Furthering the Use of FreeBSD
> Share ideas and plan to increase the number of
> companies and individuals using FreeBSD"
> "This is the mailing list for users of freebsd-stable.
> the stable cvsup target is built from the latest
> official RELEASE with the addition of critical bug fixes."
> "This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD.
> You should not send "how to" questions to the
> technical lists unless you consider the question
> to be pretty technical."
> Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich
> Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ".
> Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64,
> Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/
The question "Why are you using FreeBSD ?" was a very good one , but , in
my opinion , other side "Why are you not using FreeBSD?" would be
appropriate , because in engineering , everything for any subject is
When "Disadvantages" is NOT evaluated sufficiently well , the results
mostly will be unpredictable .
Instead of corrupting the original thread , I wanted to help to cover the
other side in parallel to the
original question .
If you think , my response is unconscious , here is the my subscription
list to FreeBSD mailing lists :
freebsd-advocacy at freebsd.org
freebsd-announce at freebsd.org
freebsd-chromium at freebsd.org
freebsd-arch at freebsd.org
freebsd-cluster at freebsd.org
freebsd-current at freebsd.org
freebsd-database at freebsd.org
freebsd-doc at freebsd.org
freebsd-emulation at freebsd.org
freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org
freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org
freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org
freebsd-multimedia at freebsd.org
freebsd-net at freebsd.org
freebsd-performance at freebsd.org
freebsd-ports at freebsd.org
freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
freebsd-small at freebsd.org
freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
freebsd-standards at freebsd.org
freebsd-threads at freebsd.org
freebsd-x11 at freebsd.org
freebsd-rc at freebsd.org
freebsd-pf at freebsd.org
freebsd-apache at freebsd.org
freebsd-usb at freebsd.org
freebsd-hpc at freebsd.org
freebsd-drivers at freebsd.org
freebsd-virtualization at freebsd.org
freebsd-sysinstall at freebsd.org
freebsd-toolchain at freebsd.org
freebsd-office at freebsd.org
freebsd-desktop at freebsd.org
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
More information about the freebsd-questions