Which mailinglist is appropriate for discussing uart changes?

[Julian H. Stacey]

Frank Shute wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:10:30PM +0100, Terrence Koeman wrote:
> >
> > Could someone point me to the right mailinglist to discuss adding
> > support for the MCS9904 chip to uart? I'm working on it, but I have
> > some questions regarding FIFO sizes and how they are currently
> > determined.
> >=20
> > Thanks.
> >=20
> > -- Regards, T. Koeman, MTh/BSc/BPsy; Technical Monk
> 
> Hi Terrence,
> 
> Looking at the list of mailing lists, I'd say your best bet is to send
> an e-mail to freebsd-net@ asking them if it's appropriate to ask the
> question there and if not where.
> 
> uarts and FIFOs sounds like it's network stack to me and I'd guess
> someone on that list might be able to supply you with an answer.

No, net@ is net protocols.

Getting a new uart working is driver work, for that
	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
shows (though I'm not familiar with that list)
	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-drivers
As fallback, try hackers@ for normal developing based on a release, 
or current@ if you want more developers on the bleeding edge.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ".
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
	Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix.  http://berklix.org/yahoo/