Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
mexas at bristol.ac.uk
Mon Jul 18 09:02:13 UTC 2011
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 06:05:47AM -0700, perryh at pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Joshua Isom <jrisom at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/17/2011 6:16 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > > On Sunday 17 July 2011 10:13:13 C. Bergstr??m wrote:
> > >> I hope gnome does [go Linux-only].. Maybe then more
> > >> people would forget about it and focus on making KDE better ;)
> > What about enlightenment?
> For us old-timers :)
> What's the advantage of any of these "desktop environments" (Gnome,
> KDE, enlightenment, Xfce) over ordinary X11 with (say) FVWM2 or TWM?
> Certainly there are some useful apps that, for better or worse, are
> built with gtk or the KDE toolkit, but what does the full-blown
> environment really contribute (other than bloat)?
mwm is all I need. Since it is a part of
open-motif, which is required by few other
important ports like xpdf, gnuplot and teTeX,
I don't even need to install a separate twm.
I'd speculate that the idea that one
needs to install a fucking monster of
a package A to do a job B, and then
another fucking monster C to do a job D
might be coming from Windows world.
IMHO the old unix philosophy of
having a combination of multiple simple
tools to do a multitude of complex tasks
is still true for modern FreeBSD.
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
More information about the freebsd-questions