Revision control advice
rbyrnes at gmail.com
Thu Dec 22 05:21:21 UTC 2011
On 22 December 2011 15:07, Outback Dingo <outbackdingo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:24 PM, ss griffon <ssgriffonuser at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Da Rock
>> <freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>> On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>> I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
>>>> resources have come to naught and I think you folks may have some experience
>>>> in this area.
>>>> I'm looking to set up some sort of revision control system at work. Simple
>>>> enough, except that our situation is approximately the reverse of what most
>>>> revision control systems are designed for.
>>>> Unlike, e.g., FreeBSD kernel development, we have dozens or hundreds of
>>>> small, rapid-fire projects that are created at the rate of 3 to 20 per
>>>> month. They last a few days or a few months and are (usually) not developed
>>>> afterward. Each project has one to three developers working on it, sometimes
>>>> simultaneously. Usually it's one guy per project.
>>>> Since my programmers are not necessarily UNIX-savvy, I'd like to deploy a
>>>> web interface for them which will allow them to create new repositories
>>>> (projects) as well as the normal checkin, checkout, etc. I want to set this
>>>> up once, and from there on have the programmers deal with managing their own
>>>> repos. And heaven forfend exposing them to the horrors of the shell.
>>>> I've built a test server (9.0-RC3, amd64) for experimenting with this
>>>> stuff. So far I've installed and played with:
>>>> - fossil. I like the simplicity and light weight, but it doesn't seem to
>>>> allow creation of new repos at all (let alone multiple ones) from the web
>>>> interface, and the documentation is meager. I've pretty much given up on it.
>>>> - subversion, which looks like the heavy hitter of RCSs, but it's not at
>>>> all clear to me how to handle the multiple-project scenario. Still working
>>>> on it.
>>>> - git looks promising, but I have not installed it yet.
>>>> If anyone can point me to a tool that might be suitable, I would be most
>>> I'd suggest subversion. It allows individual files to be versioned, you can
>>> setup a webdav interface, and there are other tools that can help maintain
>>> Forget the individual repositories. Setup a single repository and have
>>> directories for each project. in each directory you can then setup trunk,
>>> branches, whatever, as per best practices in the Book.
>>> Designate a person or two to administer, and use directory level auth, or
>>> another alternative I haven't thought of.
>>> My 2c's anyway. HTH
>>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> Yeah I would second what Mr Rock says. Set up a single repo where
>> folders can be used for projects. Since svn lets you checkout sub
>> folders of a repo, each developer can check out the folder that
>> corresponds to their project. Also, Tortoise svn is a very nice
>> graphical utility that will allow your developers to manage there svn
>> folders without even needing a web interface (most non unix people
>> that I know like tortoise), so there is less maintenance for you :)
>> Finally, kudos to moving towards using version control, its an
>> important step for a software company.
> git or mercurial - best choices
For what reasons?
A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human
affairs has always been dominant and controlling.
(Ambrose Bierce - The Devils Dictionary)
More information about the freebsd-questions