Too many binary packages are missing

Yuri yuri at rawbw.com
Fri Oct 15 18:38:53 UTC 2010


On 10/15/10 09:39, b. f. wrote:
> On 10/15/10, Ian Smith<smithi at nimnet.asn.au>  wrote:
> ...
>
>    
>> http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable works,
>> it's what portupgrade looks at on an 8.1-STABLE system, but it's a bit
>> sad finding the last directory updated at 1st October.  I checked just
>> one subdir, sysutils, and the newest file there is 30th September.
>>      
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html
> http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portsuploadstatus.py
>
> ...
>
>    
>> Er, 8-STABLE (packages) is for currently 8.1-STABLE (world/kernel), no?
>>      
> No.  I thought the 8-STABLE packages were from a recent snapshot of
> 8-STABLE, because that's the way that tinderboxes are set up.
> However, I checked, and actually a version of the last supported
> stable branch of 6.*, and some versions of the _oldest_ supported
> stable branches of 7,8 are used. Right now, for i386 it's:
>
> 6.x-stable -->  6.4-RELEASE-p9
> 7.x-stable -->  7.1-RELEASE-p12
> 8.x-stable -->  8.0-RELEASE-p2
> 9.x-current -->  a snaphot of 9-CURRENT
>    

For example I am watching the update process of one i386 system. 
portupgrade just failed to find one more package:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/All/kdeutils-4.5.2.tgz

Is it misconfigured, wrong path? I didn't touch this part of 
configuration at all.

Yuri


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list