AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :)
utisoft at gmail.com
Thu Dec 23 15:44:48 UTC 2010
On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock
<freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
>> <freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
>>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth
>>> feelers out, though :)
>> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a
>> Sorry you're not having much luck.
>> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable,
>> but that's better left to someone more local for you!
>> Hope you get some results soon.
> Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been a
> local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's were
> 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was
> just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, that
> may have been local.
I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little:
More information about the freebsd-questions