jerrymc at msu.edu
Mon Mar 2 10:16:59 PST 2009
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:55:39AM -0800, new_guy wrote:
> RW-15 wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:16:50 +0000
> > Frank Shute <frank at shute.org.uk> wrote:
> >> pdksh is statically linked and I don't know if bash is.
> > It's a build option.
> Seems root should have a static shell always... otherwise, all bets are off
> as some of the shared libs may be inaccessible or damaged. So long as bash
> is statically linked and properly located, there should not be an issue. But
> most folks (linux users) aren't aware of the implications of dynamic linking
> and such. So it's probably best to 'just say no' to the OP's question. Leave
> root's shell alone unless you know what you're doing and bash is built
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Root-shell-tp22274005p22293187.html
> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions