glen.j.barber at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 05:21:18 UTC 2009
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Gary Kline<kline at thought.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:24:29PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Kline<kline at thought.org> wrote:
>> > hi glenn,
>> One 'n'. :)
> gotcha! and see, this is a case of my occasionally typing > 1
> key. in vim, typing 'uu' can cause a truckload of code or whatever to
> vanish. ...
> [ ... ]
>> > use mutt is that my fingers know vi. unfortunately, there're too
>> I use mutt because "it sucks less", quoting the author.
> be nice if there were a quasi-gui version of mutt....
>> > many things in email now that require a gui reader. be nice to
>> > be able to read in evo and if i had to reply, use gvim.
>> Hmm.... Well, for what it's worth, I didn't even know *vi* had an
>> 'undo' option. I thought that was what 'q!' was for. :)
> that's almost funny; i have had to use "q!" all to often if i
> forget and use vim. it does indeed have some nice features.
> but if you have to reply using a gui mailer and your typing isn't
> flawlwss, it's keyboard <-> mouse.
I've found that 'q!' is now muscle-memory to me. When I'm actually in
front of a GUI, the Gmail/Firefox spellcheck tends to find most of my
typographical mistakes, though unfortunately, not my logic mistakes.
More information about the freebsd-questions