[Fwd: Re: List replies]
wmoran at potentialtech.com
Sun Mar 23 06:25:56 PDT 2008
Gerard <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
> Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com> wrote:
> > Da Rock <rock_on_the_web at comcen.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> That is one man's point of view. There are several others though.
a) What was your point in saying that?
b) Not really. It's a list of reasons and the reasons are factual,
not opinion. While the overall conclusion is opinion, the article
is factual and informative in nature.
More information about the freebsd-questions