Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
roberthuff at rcn.com
Thu Dec 11 07:49:09 PST 2008
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > At work, FreeBSD and Solaris are present. For some fields of
> > use, I would not FreeBSD instead of Solaris. However, I found
> isn't the reason to using solaris just the need to run
> solaris-only binary software?
I believe there are cases where the vendor publishes software
for multiple OSes, but offers official support for only some of
them. If having vendor support is a deal-breaker - either for
operational or contractual reasons - and the only alternative to
Solaris is Windows<mumble> ....
More information about the freebsd-questions