PAE or 64bit?
jgrosch at MooseRiver.com
Wed Aug 20 22:33:51 UTC 2008
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 06:04:27PM -0400, B. Cook wrote:
> hey all,
> Looking for opinions..
> We are going to be getting a server for drupal, running lighttpd and
> php, as well as exim and SA with clamav, courier or dovecot, mysql
> 51.. etc.
> Right now this setup does about 200G per month (we have two boxes) and
> were looking at getting one box to do it all (business department
> reasons) and assuming it would be doing double the work.. we would be
> looking at a single box running 600GB max per month in traffic (about
> We would be (hopefully) be going with sas drives instead of the sata
> we have atm. Not trying to make this a debate about hardware but..
> The question of at least 4G of ram came up.. and we starting debating
> about PAE or just going with x64..
> we would not be using zfs, we would be running RELENG_7_0.
> again, looking for opinions on PAE vs x64 for this type of setup.
> Thanks in advance
In my experience, PAE is brittle and has limited driver support. I'm just
not a fan of it, I prefer 64 bit. In the long run 64 bit is the path of
least resistance but your mileage may vary.
Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.3
jgrosch at MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080820/531ad8c8/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions