porteasy vs portupgrade
heli at mikestammer.com
Thu Jul 26 15:10:03 UTC 2007
> Adam J Richardson escribió:
>> Miguel wrote:
>>> Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions
>>> for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as good
>>> as portupgrade?
>>> i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade.
>> Hi Miguel,
>> I use portupgrade and portsnap, a combination which seems to work
>> fine. The only thing that annoys me about portupgrade is that it's
>> written in Ruby, and when it's time for an upgrade I always have to
>> upgrade the Ruby compiler as well. Upgrading Ruby just takes forever
>> on these old battered beige boxes.
> you are absolutly right, portsnap + portupgrade,
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
try portmaster as a replacement to portupgrade. No dependencies and it
More information about the freebsd-questions