Low Level Language Suggestions: OT

[Victor Subervi]

>
> Good point. Most legacy s/w is in C++. I'm assuming from lack of comment
> that C# is as yet an unborn language ;)
> TIA,
> Victor
>
>   On Dec 31, 2007 12:28 PM, Erich Dollansky <oceanare at pacific.net.sg>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Victor Subervi wrote:
> > > toward a low-level language. I am not good in any :( I'm thinking
> > Java's
> >
> > Assembler?
> >
> > > probably my best bet, just because there are more Java programmers out
> > there
> > > than any other language (I think). But what about C++ or C#? Your
> > comments
> >
> > I would use a combination out of C and C++.
> >
> > Even if there are more Java programmers out there, they not have the
> > experience of the most C/C++ programmers.
> >
> > Erich
> >
>
>