Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.

[Michael P. Soulier]

On 14/12/07 Giorgos Keramidas said:

> Do you have any _particular_ parts of the csh-whynot article that you
> would like to discuss, or this is a free for all flame? :)

It's the lack of shell functions that gets me. 

Once a script reaches a certain size, I just move to Perl, Python, Tcl, Ruby,
etc. 

Mike
-- 
Michael P. Soulier <msoulier at digitaltorque.ca>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
direction." --Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20071216/e0adc7a7/attachment-0001.pgp