Maybe this is a bug, should I report it?

Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-local at
Wed Dec 5 06:21:28 PST 2007

"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm at> writes:

> But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2,
> when gpg is still in the tree?
> I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2
> installed.

security/gnupg is gpg2, and has been for about a year.  
gpg1 is now a separate port, and you need to make separate
arrangements if you want to start using security/gnupg1 instead of
security/gnupg.  portupgrade has a "-o" option for this purpose.

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list