Maybe this is a bug, should I report it?

[Lowell Gilbert]

"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm at prime.gushi.org> writes:

> But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2,
> when gpg is still in the tree?
>
> I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2
> installed.

security/gnupg is gpg2, and has been for about a year.  
gpg1 is now a separate port, and you need to make separate
arrangements if you want to start using security/gnupg1 instead of
security/gnupg.  portupgrade has a "-o" option for this purpose.