Maybe this is a bug, should I report it?

[Bill Moran]

In response to "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm at prime.gushi.org>:

> But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2, when 
> gpg is still in the tree?
> 
> I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2 
> installed.

Show us the output that demonstrates this problem.

My first guess is that it's not portupgrade that's doing it, but that
some port you're upgrading now lists gpg2 as a dependency instead of
gpg, which causes the attempted installation.

But I'm just speculating without more details.

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com