ceri at submonkey.net
Mon Oct 23 21:16:02 UTC 2006
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:12:54PM +0200, pobox at verysmall.org wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >You're wrong. It's the other way around:
> > We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without
> > any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of
> > mirrors, users and developer workspaces.
> >On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-)
> What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on
> cvs - is that correct?
Until we're happy with another tool and have reasons that make moving
worth the effort, we'll stay with CVS.
This is /not/ because of the CVSup infrastructue though, which is
essentially good at throwing arbitrary filesets around and doesn't tie
us to CVS.
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20061023/f933c99c/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions