Ceri Davies ceri at
Mon Oct 23 21:16:02 UTC 2006

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:12:54PM +0200, pobox at wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >You're wrong.  It's the other way around:
> >
> >    We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without
> >    any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of
> >    mirrors, users and developer workspaces.
> >
> >On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-)
> What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on 
> cvs - is that correct?

Until we're happy with another tool and have reasons that make moving
worth the effort, we'll stay with CVS.

This is /not/ because of the CVSup infrastructue though, which is
essentially good at throwing arbitrary filesets around and doesn't tie
us to CVS.

That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list