Compatibility Between Releases Policy
Jason C. Wells
jcw at highperformance.net
Thu Oct 5 08:34:37 PDT 2006
Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Jason C. Wells wrote:
>> Where is the policy regarding compatibility between releases documented?
>> I recall reading once upon a time that FreeBSD won't break
>> compatibility for the duration of a major point release. If a third
>> party wrote software for 6.0 it would be perfectly compatible with
>> 6.1, 6.2 and on.
>> The reason I ask is that I am considering the wisdom of running
>> portupgraed with each minor point release.
> I don't think you can rely on POLA for ports. But for the base system,
> the developers try to stick to the Principle Of Least Astonishment, in
> particular across minor version numbers.
> Chears, Erik
Ports astonish me more often than FreeBSD to be sure. If one uses a
port that was built on a 6.0 system, can one trust that no bit rot will
occur by the time 6.9 rolls around. Will all of FreeBSDs interfaces and
features remain backward compatible? While the developer community
might employee POLA in this regard, this sure seems like the kind of
policy issue that would be written into our release engineering
documents. (I couldn't find it.)
More information about the freebsd-questions