Ruby gaining weight? [RESOLVED]

Karol Kwiatkowski freebsd at
Tue Oct 3 04:33:32 PDT 2006

On 03/10/2006 11:37, Pete Slagle wrote:
> Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>> Pete Slagle wrote:
>>> Recent versions of ruby18 seem to take more than 145 MB of virtual
>>> memory to build with portupgrade or "make install clean."
>> Karol Kwiatkowski wrote less than a week ago:
>>> # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby18
>>> # make -DNOPORTDOCS install
> That put me on the right track, thanks!
> Karol's example works well for the initial installation of ruby. When
> upgrading, this invocation:
>   portupgrade -m '-DNOPORTDOCS' ruby
> does the equivalent thing. Both save a tremendous amount of time and
> disk activity.

Just for the record, the last update[1] to ruby18 port brought us a
brand new knob 'WITHOUT_RDOC' :)




Karol Kwiatkowski  <freebsd at orchid dot homeunix dot org>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list