FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote:
> On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
> >
> >The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
> >you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and
> >maybe take active maintainership of it.
> >
> >You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports
> >will be met by a grinning "we told you so".
> >
> 
> Thank you Andrew,
> 
> I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on
> FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make
> sure.

That's unfortunate :(

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20061126/a81e1000/attachment.pgp