replacement for Acrobat Professional?
kdk at daleco.biz
Wed Jan 11 07:36:49 PST 2006
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
>>It's up to Michael, though, to tell us how well it works, I suppose. No
>>package in packages-6-current/Latest, so I'm building from src, and
>>headed for bed before it gets done I imagine.
>So, for posterity...
>I'd rate pdftops and flpsed as 95% of the way there for this audience.
>Some small things don't work, particularly "layered" elements. Some
>parts of the manuscript I was given were highlighted, for example. In
>the original the highlighting is transparent, while the pdftops/flpsed
>combination the highlighting obliterates the underlying text. There
>are other, very minor variations.
>That last 5% might not be critical for most people; I would certainly
>use it for preparing personal documents, or even documents within my
>company. But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for preparing PDFs
>for this application, pdftops/flpsed is not acceptable. When you dump
>a PDF directly to a web press and produce a book from it, tiny
>variations in page placement or layout will result in a really useless
>print run. But from the various tools people have suggested and that
>I've tried last night and this morning, it's as good as we have.
It certainly doesn't seem as "full-featured" as some commercial
products (ref. subject line), and my short testing concurs with
I had some trouble with "image handling" --- I imagine that this
is similar to the "layered elements" you mention; I have no great
wealth of personal knowledge of the PDF format, though.
The author's homepage states that flpsed is still alpha-quality
software. I'd say it looks rather promising for the future, perhaps;
we can hope so, and do what we can to support it.
"God doesn't play dice." --- Albert Einstein
More information about the freebsd-questions