VPN Solution for my current Situation.

perikillo perikillo at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 10:15:03 PST 2006


On 12/11/06, stom at free.fr <stom at free.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Selon Nathan Vidican <nvidican at wmptl.com>:
>
> > perikillo wrote:
> > >  Hi people.
> > >
> > >  I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current
> > > situation:
> > >
> > > 2 Offices  1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border).
> > >
> > > In E.U. Offices with have:
> > >
> > > DNS+Firewall+Proxy  Linux
> > > Mail Server Linux
> > > Samba Linux
> > > PBX Altigen Win NT
> > > ERP DBA Linux
> > > Backup FreeBSD.
> > >
> > > Mexico
> > > PBX Same system
> > > Samba
> > > ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites)
> > > Backup FreeBSD
> > >
> > > 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U.
> > >   40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access
> > >   all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access.
> > >
> > > We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico.
> > >
> > > If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in
> > > E.U.
> > >
> > > Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls,
> external
> > > calls.
> > >
> > > All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link,
> but
> > > next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate
> the
> > > next contract.
> > >
> > > Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and
> > > see is
> > > we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk.
> > >
> > > My  questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private
> > > Line,
> > > and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities
> > > if one
> > > link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the
> > > workload,
> > > with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation:
> > >
> > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc?
> > >
> > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN
> > > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be
> problematic?
> > >
> > > Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome,
> > > thanks all
> > > for your time!!!
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > >
> > >
> > mpd for FreeBSD... it just works.
>
> The choice is "up to you" - We also use OpenVPN for site-to-site VPN SSL
> tunnels
> and it is also a good and easy solution. Authentication is based on X509
> certificates for cross-authentication - With OpenVPN's multiple and
> fine-grained options.
>
> We have good performance with strong encryption options.
>
> The protocol (UDP) encapsulation is also a nice feature.
>
> The Linux<->FreeBSD is not a problem at all.
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan Vidican
> > nvidican at wmptl.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> >
>
> Philippe Laquet.
>
>
   I see that OpenVPN is the first choice, i will try this port first &&
latter continue with other ones.

   Thanks all for your answer.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list