Intel 64bit / AMD 64 bit advantage
martin.miedema at gmail.com
Mon Aug 28 08:00:43 UTC 2006
ke han wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> 32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most
>>> apps. The
>> yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than
>> FreeBSD/i386 on athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled
>> for P4. With default FreeBSD/i386 - it will be at least 30%.
>> just because it's not just 64-bit addresses, but twice the registers
>> (r8-r15) allowing C compiler to generate more efficient code.
>> For now AMD64 is the fastest and cheapest architecture - at least
>> with AMD processors, not intel clones. (YES now intel makes clones of
>> AMD processors)
> I stand corrected ;-)...This is good info, thanks.
> However, to the original post, you will not see 10-30 % performance
> difference on your email or file sharing between an Intel Celeron and
> AMD Opteron. These types of apps are Disk and Network IO bound.
> Spend your money on redundancy/fail-over of hard drive and power
> supply. Also choosing a well regarded NIC is important.
> ke han
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Thanks a million for this info, this saved he good bunch of money, which
I can use better some were else :)
More information about the freebsd-questions